The Silent Collapse: Why Earth’s Natural Carbon Sponge Is Failing
A new study shows that Earth's natural carbon uptake may be weakening—signaling a decline in the planet’s capacity to buffer rising emissions
Breaking the Ice:
In a recent study published in Weather (March 2025), researchers James and Samuel Curran present updated evidence that the Earth’s natural carbon sequestration is no longer keeping pace with rising atmospheric CO₂. Drawing on more than six decades of data from the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii, the study revisits the Keeling Curve to examine the strength of the terrestrial biosphere’s seasonal carbon drawdown—an essential feature of the global carbon cycle.
The analysis focuses on the intra-annual dip in CO₂ concentrations each year, a direct result of plant uptake during the Northern Hemisphere’s growing season. This annual “breathing” pattern serves as a reliable proxy for the health and functioning of natural carbon sinks like forests and soils. By extending previous work with new data through 2024, the Currans identify a critical turning point: the amplitude of this seasonal drawdown appears to have peaked in 2008 and has been gradually declining since.
Their findings suggest that the Earth’s capacity to naturally absorb carbon dioxide—once increasing steadily—is now weakening. The implications are significant: with this biospheric buffer eroding, atmospheric CO₂ levels may rise more rapidly, even if emissions remain stable.
Quick Melt:
Natural carbon sinks have long played a vital role in moderating the climate impacts of human activity. For much of the late 20th century, the biosphere acted as a growing counterweight to fossil fuel emissions, steadily increasing its annual CO₂ uptake. The Currans estimate that sequestration was rising by approximately 0.8% per year in the 1960s—a rate that, had it continued, would have meaningfully offset the rise in atmospheric CO₂.
However, that trend has reversed. According to the study’s updated regression analysis, sequestration is now declining at roughly 0.25% per year. This shift, while gradual, has measurable consequences. The researchers calculate that current atmospheric CO₂ concentrations are increasing by approximately 2.5 parts per million (ppm) annually—but would have been closer to 1.9 ppm per year had the earlier sequestration trajectory held.
In effect, the declining strength of natural sequestration is amplifying the climate impact of ongoing emissions. The study’s analysis suggests that this reduction in carbon uptake has already contributed to a 25%–35% increase in the annual CO₂ accumulation rate. Even more modest future emissions could drive faster rises in atmospheric concentrations, simply because the biosphere is no longer offsetting them to the same degree.
While the study does not forecast an immediate tipping point, it does identify a structural change in how the Earth system is functioning—a shift that may require adjustments in how emissions targets and climate strategies are calibrated.
The Thaw:
Why is Natural Carbon Sequestration Slowing Down? AccumulationZone Explains.
At the center of the study is a simple yet powerful metric: the difference between the annual maximum and minimum atmospheric CO₂ levels observed at Mauna Loa. This seasonal “dip”—caused by the uptake of CO₂ by Northern Hemisphere vegetation during spring and summer—has long served as a proxy for terrestrial carbon sequestration.
By applying quadratic regression (used to model non-linear trends) to the annual peaks and troughs of the Keeling Curve (which depicts daily global CO₂ concentrations over time), the authors quantify how the magnitude of this seasonal drop has changed over time. Their results indicate that the amplitude of the drawdown increased for several decades but began to plateau and then decline starting around 2008. This change aligns with broader concerns about the durability of land-based carbon sinks under conditions of sustained environmental stress.
The study also revisits earlier modeling from the authors’ 2016 work, applying updated data to assess how the loss of sequestration alters the annual increment of atmospheric CO₂. Their revised estimates suggest that even a 20% reduction in biospheric carbon uptake can drive disproportionately larger increases in atmospheric CO₂ growth—owing to the sensitivity of the carbon cycle to small changes in either direction.
Crucially, the authors note that to merely compensate for the decline in natural sequestration, anthropogenic emissions would now need to fall by approximately 0.3% per year. This is not an unattainable number—but it does add an additional layer of complexity to an already difficult global mitigation challenge.
Final Thoughts
Although the study doesn’t suggest that natural carbon sinks have failed, it does show they may be slowing down, at a time when their role is more important than ever. Understanding and responding to this shift will require careful attention from policymakers, scientists, and climate modelers alike. As the study makes clear, the relationship between emissions and atmospheric concentrations is not fixed—it depends, in part, on the health of the natural systems that have long worked in our favor.
This is a serious problem indeed. When I discussed it on another platform, some people pointed towards the increase in 'greening' that has been observed globally, but it just goes to show that not all green is good green. If you cut down or burn a forest and replace it with crops, it's not going to absorb and sequestration as much carbon. Especially if those crops are then fed to cattle.
Add it to the list of feedbacks and tipping elements we face.
You may like my channel: https://drtomharris.substack.com